• Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Ken Smith, CLU, ChFC
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • Executive Benefits Overview Webinar
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Ken Smith, CLU, ChFC
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • Executive Benefits Overview Webinar
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
IZALE Financial Group

Blog

Surrender of Policy Subject to Loan Results in Phantom Income

1/6/2014

0 Comments

 
SUMMARY:  A taxpayer with modest income surrendered a policy on his life. On that date, the policy was subject to a significant loan. The Tax Court held that the amount of the loan in excess of the taxpayer’s investment in the contract was includible in his income and was not excludible as a discharge of indebtedness even though he was insolvent. The judge then applied a three-factor test in finding taxpayer was not liable for an accuracy-related penalty because of good faith and reasonable reliance on professional advice.
BACKGROUND:  In 1984, Samuel Brach acquired an insurance policy on his life. In 1995, he borrowed a significant sum against the policy cash value. Interest payments accrued on the loan. In 2010, unable to pay premiums or make loan payments, he surrendered the policy. The total surrender amount was $65,903. After paying off the outstanding loan, Brach received a check for only $3,786, the policy’s net value. At the time of the surrender, Brach’s investment in contract was $32,778. The insurance carrier issued a Form 1099-R showing taxable income from the surrender of $33,125. 

Mr. and Mrs. Brach consulted an enrolled agent who prepared their 2010 income tax return providing him with Mrs. Bach’s W-2, both of their Forms 1099-SSA and Form 1099-R. The enrolled agent determined that the couple was insolvent and that the discharge of the policy loan was not income under Code Section 108(a)(1)(B). The agent also determined that none of Mr. and Mrs. Brach’s Social Security benefits were taxable since they had insufficient other income. Mr. and Mrs. Brach filed the return prepared by the enrolled agent without attaching Forms 1099-SSA and Form 1099-R or even Form 982, Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness, even though they were claiming a discharge because of insolvency. 

The IRS issued a notice of deficiency of $6,949 and an accuracy-related penalty of $1,390. 

The taxpayers argued that, because the policy loan was a discharged while they were insolvent, it was not includable income. 

The IRS countered that Mr. and Mrs. Brach failed to prove that they were insolvent (perhaps because they failed to file Form 982 showing insolvency in excess of the indebtedness). In the alternative the IRS argued that the loan was extinguished by payment from the surrender proceeds and thus was not discharged within the meaning of IRC Section 108. 

RESULT:  Gross Income From Surrender. The Special Trial Judge agreed with the IRS that the policy loan was repaid from the surrender proceeds rather than being discharged without payment. Without a discharge of indebtedness, the exclusion under Code Section 108 with its insolvency issues was not relevant. 

Income from insurance is included in gross income under IRC Section 61(a)(10). The amount included in gross income upon surrender of a life insurance policy is determined under Code Section 72(e)(5). The amount received is included in gross income to the extent it exceeds the taxpayer’s investment in the contract. Investment in the contract is defined as the aggregate amount of premiums or other consideration paid for the contract less aggregate amounts received under the contract to the extent such amounts were excludable from gross income. Loans against the cash value of an insurance policy are not distributions. Thus, when the policy is surrendered and the proceeds are used to satisfy the loan, the payment is treated as if the taxpayers received a distribution at that time and then applied it against the outstanding loan. 

The judge held that Mr. and Mrs. Brach received a gross distribution of $65,903 upon surrender of the policy ($62,117 in repayment of the loan and $3,786 in cash). The gross distribution less their investment in the contract of $32,778 resulted in gross income of $33,125. 

Accuracy-Related Penalty. The Special Trial judge held that Mr. and Mrs. Brach were not liable for an accuracy-related penalty under IRC Section 6662(a) and (b)(2) since they met the three prong test for reasonable cause by acting in good faith reliance on the advice of a tax professional: 

1. The adviser was a competent professional since he was an enrolled agent. 

2. The taxpayer gave the enrolled agent complete and accurate information including Mrs. Brach’s W-2 and all Forms 1099. 

3. The taxpayers relied in good faith on the enrolled agent’s judgment since they were not experienced in tax matters and had no reason not to accept the advice. 

RELEVANCE: 

1. This is a sad tale of the surrender of a policy subject to a loan in excess of investment in contract resulting in $62,117 of phantom income. To further exasperate the problem, the phantom income resulted in taxation of Social Security benefits and disallowance of earned income tax credit and a child tax credit. If Mr. Brach had held the policy to death and not been forced to surrender the policy, the payment of the loan proceeds with death proceeds would not have resulted in any taxable income. 

2. Policy owners should always be cautioned against borrowing too large of a sum against the cash value and risking lapse if the loan eventually equals cash value. There should be a sufficient cash value cushion to protect against a lapse. If at all possible, the policy owner should have a plan to repay the loan. If policy dividends are used to pay interest or repay the loan, the dividends would reduce the investment in contract and any excess dividends used for such purpose would be taxable income. 

3. Note that if the policy had been a modified endowment contract, unlike policies which are not MECs, the loans would have been a distribution at the date of the loan resulting in immediate taxable income if the policy had cash value in excess of investment in the contract. 

4. The interest on a loan against a personally owned contract is not deductible as personal interest. Since Mr. Brach’s policy was issued before June 9, 1997, it was grandfathered from this interest deduction prohibition. However, to deduct the interest, he would have to have met the requirements of IRC Sections 264(a)(2) and (3) and 163(h).
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    IZALE Financial Group

    As an independent firm, we’re driven by close client relationships. For you, that means that our technical expertise is yours to rely on. 

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    March 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013


    Categories

    All
    1035 Tax Deferred Exchange
    2018
    401K
    457f Plans
    AALU
    A. M. Ratings
    Articles
    Asset Man
    Asset Management
    Asset Protection
    BalancedComp
    Bank
    Banking
    Bank Owned Life Insurance
    Bankruptcy
    Banks
    Basel III
    Bear Market
    Beneficiary
    Benefit Plans
    Benefits
    Board Of Directors
    BOL
    BOLI
    Brian Smedley
    Bruce Barge
    Buisness Owned Life Insurance
    Business Owned Life Insurance
    Butterfly Effect
    Capital Conservation Buffer
    Capital Management
    Capital Requirements
    Cap Rates
    CBAI
    CDC
    CDI
    Center For Disease Control
    CEO
    CFO
    Chris
    Chris Richardson
    Clawback
    COI
    Cole Frago
    COLI
    Common Equity
    Commuity Bank Of Trenton
    Community Banking
    Community Banks
    Compensation
    Compliance
    Connecticut Court
    Consumer Protection Act
    Consumer Protection Act Of 2010
    Coronavirus
    Corporate Owned Life Insurance
    Corporate Taxation
    CPA
    Credit Rates
    Credit Union
    Credit Union Magazine
    Credit Union National Association
    Credit Unions
    CUES
    CUNA
    Daniel Kahneman
    DBO
    DCUC
    DCUC Alert Magazine
    Death Benefits
    Defense Credit Union Council
    Divorce
    Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform
    Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
    Econocheck
    Economic Forecast
    Employee Benefits
    ERISA
    Estate Planning
    Estate Tax
    Estate Trust
    Executive Benefits
    Executive Compensation
    Executive Retirement Plans
    Family Legacy
    FDIC
    Federal Reserve Bank
    Fee-based Checking
    Fee Checking
    Fee Income Strategies
    FICA
    Finance Industry
    Financial Education
    Financial Executives
    Financial Forecast
    Financial Managers Society
    Financial Planning
    Finanical Reporting
    Fintect
    Fiscal Year 2015
    Fixed Income
    FL
    FMS
    Fmstv
    FRS
    GAMA
    Gary Wilberg
    Gerald H. Sherman
    Gift Tax
    Global Markets
    Greenberg Traurig
    Greene V. Commissioner
    Guggenheim Partners
    House Ways And Means
    IDProtect
    Incentive Based Compensation
    Incentive-based Compensation
    Income Tax
    Indexed BOLI
    Indexed Universal Life
    Inherit
    Inheritance
    In-Laws
    Insurance
    Insurance Premium
    Insurance Tax Liability
    Interest Rates
    Investment Portfolio
    Investments
    IRA
    IRC
    Irrevocable Trust
    IRS
    IUL
    IZALE
    IZALE Financial Group
    IZALE Testimonial
    JB Barnes
    Jim Patterson
    Jobs Act 2017
    Joe Tripalin
    Jonathan Barnes
    Jonathan M. Forster
    Ken Kies
    Key Person Life Policy
    Las Vegas
    Leadership
    Legacy Planning
    Life Insurance
    Life Policy
    Liquidity Risks
    LLP
    Long Term Disability
    Martin Kalb
    Matt Bush
    May Disability Month
    Media
    National Credit Union Administration
    NCUA
    Non-interest Income
    Non-profit
    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
    Nonqualified Plans
    NQDC
    Obama Administration
    Orlando
    Pay Ratio Rule
    Phil
    Phil Aderton
    Philip Aderton
    Ponzi Market
    Premarital Planning
    President Obama
    President's Budget
    Press
    Press Releases
    Profit Sharing
    PRS
    Rebecca Manicone
    Recession
    Regulationry Issues
    Regulatory Capital Calculation
    Regulatory Environments
    Resources
    Retirement
    Retirement Plan
    Revenue Strategies
    Richard A. Sirus
    Risk Management
    Roth
    R. Scott Richardson
    SBLI Term Life Insurance
    Scott MInard
    Scott Minerd
    Scott Richardson
    SEC
    Secure Checking
    SERP
    Sherman & Patterson
    Small Business Resale
    Social Security Tax
    Split Dollar Loans
    Split Dollar Plans
    Steve Brown
    Steve Fichtenbaum
    Steven B. Lapidus
    Stock Exchange
    Stock Market
    Stuart Lewis
    Tax Benefit
    Tax Code
    Tax Court
    Tax Cuts
    Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Of 2017
    Tax Deductions
    Tax Deferred Assets
    Tax Implications
    Tax Incentives
    Tax Law
    Tax Liabilities
    Tax Planning
    Tax Refor
    Tax Reform
    Taylor Advisors
    TCJA 2017
    The Forum
    Todd Taylor
    Top Hat Plans
    Treasury Bonds
    Trust
    Trustee
    Trusts
    US Supreme Court
    Washington Report
    Webinars
    Webinar W.O.W.S.
    Whole Life Insurance
    World Economic Forum
    World Economy
    WRMarketplace
    WRNewswire

Client Log-In

Log in to Pangburn
Log in to RBOLI.com

Contact

 855-492-5334 | Contact
Join Our Mailing List
© 2011 - 2019 IZALE Financial Group. All rights reserved. Login.
​Effective June 9, 2017, all individuals who provide advice to retirement plans, including Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), must abide by the fiduciary standard.  What does the fiduciary standard mean?  This means that your advisor must put your interests first before their own or that of the firm, make prudent recommendations, charge reasonable compensation and make no misrepresentations to you regarding recommended investments.  The recommendations made by your advisor must be based upon your specific investment needs and objectives.  The fiduciary standard is applicable to any recommendations that your advisor makes to you, the client, for your retirement account.
IZALE Website Privacy Policy
Please note the firm does have policies and procedures in place to monitor this level of fiduciary responsibility for our clients.
IZALE Financial Group does insurance business in California as IZALE LLC Insurance Agency
This site is published for residents of the United States only. Representatives may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed until appropriate registration is obtained or exemption from registration is determined. Not all of services referenced on this site are available in every state and through every advisor listed. For additional information, please contact Scott Richardson at 855-492-5334 .