• Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
IZALE Financial Group

Blog

Sometimes Love Knows No Boundaries 

4/13/2017

0 Comments

 
by Greenberg Traurig Shareholder Jonathan M. Forster
TOPIC:  Protecting Your Family Legacy from In-Laws.

MARKET TREND: Interest in the family creditor protection offered by irrevocable trusts is on the rise.

SYNOPSIS: When creating legacy plans for their families, parents often are as concerned about creditor protection as they are about transfer taxes, especially as to how that protection relates to marital claims against their legacy. Leaving a child’s inheritance in an irrevocable trust can act as a substitute to a premarital plan, avoiding many of the difficulties associated with using and enforcing prenuptial agreements. To be effective, however, the trust agreement should not: (1) rely solely on a spendthrift clause, (2) provide the beneficiary with too much access or control, or (3) mandate trust distributions.

TAKE AWAYS: While parents generally want to protect their family legacy from in-laws, premarital planning is often difficult to discuss and implement. A fully discretionary trust properly administered by an independent trustee should offer enhanced creditor protection and may serve as an effective substitute for a child’s premarital plan. Parents should pay close attention to the trust’s jurisdiction, however, as the protections afforded to trust assets with regard to marital claims are highly dependent on applicable state law.

When leaving a legacy for children, parents are often concerned about creditor protection, especially as it relates to marital claims against that legacy should a child’s marriage end in divorce. Leaving a child’s inheritance in an irrevocable trust can act as a substitute to a premarital plan; however, parents should review the following “dos and don’ts” to enhance their trust’s overall creditor and family legacy protection.
PREMARITAL PLANNING TRUST SOLUTIONS

Spendthrift Clauses

DON’T: Assume Spendthrift Clauses Cover Marital Claims. Spendthrift clauses prohibit a beneficiary from voluntarily or involuntarily assigning his or her right to current or future trust distributions, including to creditors. State laws, however, vary on the actual protection afforded by spendthrift clauses and may provide exceptions for payment of spousal support claims and alimony. The protections also may be undermined if a beneficiary retains too much control over the trust.

Trust Distributions

DON’T: Require Mandatory Distributions. While mandatory trust distributions of income and/or principal ensure that a beneficiary will receive certain amounts at set times, those assets may be deemed marital assets in divorce proceedings. Further, depending on state law, creditors may even be able to attach distributions that are due but not yet paid from the trust, as well as levy future distributions for judgments and debts that remain unpaid.

DON’T: Give Beneficiary Sole Authority Over Distributions. For premarital planning purposes, a beneficiary who has the power to authorize distributions to himself, even if limited by an “ascertainable standard” restricting distributions to specific needs, such as for the beneficiary’s health, education, maintenance, or support (“HEMS”), may still subject the trust assets to marital property claims in the event of a divorce or disinheritance of a surviving spouse.

Completely prohibiting a beneficiary from having any distribution authority over his or her trust likely provides the greatest protection. If beneficiary participation is desired, subjecting the beneficiary’s power to the consent of other beneficiaries or the approval/veto of an independent trustee may offer a compromise.

DO: Use Fully Discretionary Trusts. The trust agreement should authorize, but not require, the trustees to make distributions to trust beneficiaries. For the greatest protection, the discretion should allow distributions to any beneficiary for any purpose. This discretion, along with the next two provisions, may make the beneficial interest of any one beneficiary negligible for purposes of a judgment or creditor claim.

If desired, ascertainable standards can be used to restrict trust distributions to HEMS, but only if applicable state law interprets the standard as a limit on the trustee’s discretion, not mandate requiring HEMS distributions. To further clarify, the trust agreement should say that the trustee “may” (and not “shall”) make distributions for HEMS.

DO: Authorize (and Make) Variable and Unequal Distributions. The trust agreement should provide that the trustee: (1) has discretion to make distributions in favor of any one, all, or none of the beneficiaries, in equal or unequal shares, (2) need not treat the beneficiaries equally or proportionally with regard to trust distributions, and (3) need not follow any pattern set in prior distributions for later distributions. The trustee also should not actually make standardized or regularly-scheduled distributions to avoid the claim that certain beneficiaries had an implicit understanding regarding the timing and amount of their distributions.

DO: Allow for Changes to Beneficiary Class. The trust agreement can allow future persons to be added to the class of beneficiaries and/or allow removal of existing beneficiaries. For example, the trust can benefit multiple generations of descendants. Alternatively, the trust agreement can authorize someone else, like a trust protector, to remove existing beneficiaries or add other persons, such as additional family members or charities, to the beneficiary class.

Trustee Selection

DON’T: Name Beneficiary as Sole Trustee. As individuals often struggle with who to name as trustees of family trusts, they frequently appoint children or other descendants as trustees, especially when children have attained a certain age or if they have proven their responsibility. As noted, however, marital and creditor claims likely will be an issue if a beneficiary is the sole trustee of his or her trust, even if distributions are limited by an ascertainable standard. If a beneficiary will act as a trustee of his or her trust, make sure to name a co-trustee and to not give the beneficiary-trustee sole power to make distributions to him or herself.

DO: Consider Independent Trustees. To further enhance protections, the trust should appoint one or more “independent” trustees who hold sole distribution authority over discretionary distributions or share such authority over distributions (and cannot be out-voted or overruled by any non-independent trustee(s)). Ideally the independent trustee would be a financial institution or other professional co-trustee, as they have the infrastructure and experience for trust administration and may be more able to demonstrate independence.
If desired, a beneficiary can have the power to remove and replace the independent trustee. To preserve independence and limit the beneficiary’s power over the trust, however, it is important that the beneficiary be limited to appointing trustees who are not related or subordinate to him or her. Otherwise, the beneficiary arguably retains indirect control over his or her trust.

Trust Administration

DO: Consider Consolidating Trust Assets in Entities. To increase protection in the event that a trust becomes subject to creditor or marital claims, “back-up” protection may be achieved by having the trust assets consolidated in underlying family entities, like family limited partnerships or limited liability companies, which can impose restrictions on the transfer/alienation of entity interests or on the ability to receive entity distributions (the level of protection provided by the entities will vary by state law).

DO: Follow Administrative Formalities. The administration and circumstances of the trust should support the true independence of the trustees from the trust beneficiaries, since lack of independence may evidence that a beneficiary retained indirect control over the trust. The trustee, and not the beneficiary, should be solely responsible for handling trust accounts, issuing payments, selecting service providers, etc. Further, the trustee should not simply “rubber stamp” beneficiary requests for trust payments but should exercise true discretion when making distributions and document the deliberations related to those distribution decisions. Using an unrelated or professional trustee may help as friends or family members serving as trustees may find it difficult to maintain separation from beneficiaries.

Trust Intentions

DO: Clearly State Trust Exclusions and Intentions. The trust agreement should clearly state that trust assets are not intended as part of the marital estate of any beneficiary, and ex-spouses are not intended to be direct or indirect beneficiaries of the trust, whether through divorce or other legal proceedings.

State Law

DO: Consider State Law Impact. The extent of marital asset inclusion for, or creditor access to, trust assets is very fact specific and will depend on applicable state law, including whether the state trust, marital, and/or creditor laws have specific statutes related to the impact of creditor and marital claims on spendthrift clauses and/or discretionary trusts, and how state courts interpret those laws. Certain states, like Delaware, offer specific protection from creditor claims for funds distributed from discretionary and spendthrift trusts. Thus, jurisdiction selection is critical for a trust that is intended as a substitute for a beneficiary’s premarital plan.
Picture
Download the Report
NOTES

TCO 362479942v2
1 See e.g., Carmack et al. v. Reynolds, (Ca. Sup. Ct.), 2017 WL 1090497, discussed in WRNewswire #17.03.29.
2 See e.g., Pfannenstiehl vs. Pfannenstiehl, 88 Mass. App. Ct. 121, 37 N.E.3d 15 (2015), rev'd 2016 Mass. LEXIS 591 (Mass. Aug. 4, 2016).
3 See e.g., Lisa M. Rico and Judith A. Saxe, “The Planning Implications of ‘Pfannenstiehl’,” The Daily Record Newswire, as posted in Detroit Legal News, Feb. 4, 2016.

DISCLAIMER
This information is intended solely for information and education and is not intended for use as legal or tax advice. Reference herein to any specific tax or other planning strategy, process, product or service does not constitute promotion, endorsement or recommendation by AALU. Persons should consult with their own legal or tax advisors for specific legal or tax advice.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    IZALE Financial Group

    As an independent firm, we’re driven by close client relationships. For you, that means that our technical expertise is yours to rely on. 

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    March 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013


    Categories

    All
    1035 Tax Deferred Exchange
    2018
    401K
    457f Plans
    AALU
    A. M. Ratings
    Articles
    Asset Man
    Asset Management
    Asset Protection
    BalancedComp
    Bank
    Banking
    Bank Owned Life Insurance
    Bankruptcy
    Banks
    Basel III
    Bear Market
    Beneficiary
    Benefit Plans
    Benefits
    Board Of Directors
    BOL
    BOLI
    Brian Smedley
    Bruce Barge
    Buisness Owned Life Insurance
    Business Owned Life Insurance
    Butterfly Effect
    Capital Conservation Buffer
    Capital Management
    Capital Requirements
    Cap Rates
    CBAI
    CDC
    CDI
    Center For Disease Control
    CEO
    CFO
    Chris
    Chris Richardson
    Clawback
    COI
    Cole Frago
    COLI
    Common Equity
    Commuity Bank Of Trenton
    Community Banking
    Community Banks
    Compensation
    Compliance
    Connecticut Court
    Consumer Protection Act
    Consumer Protection Act Of 2010
    Coronavirus
    Corporate Owned Life Insurance
    Corporate Taxation
    CPA
    Credit Rates
    Credit Union
    Credit Union Magazine
    Credit Union National Association
    Credit Unions
    CUES
    CUNA
    Daniel Kahneman
    DBO
    DCUC
    DCUC Alert Magazine
    Death Benefits
    Defense Credit Union Council
    Divorce
    Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform
    Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
    Econocheck
    Economic Forecast
    Employee Benefits
    ERISA
    Estate Planning
    Estate Tax
    Estate Trust
    Executive Benefits
    Executive Compensation
    Executive Retirement Plans
    Family Legacy
    FDIC
    Federal Reserve Bank
    Fee-based Checking
    Fee Checking
    Fee Income Strategies
    FICA
    Finance Industry
    Financial Education
    Financial Executives
    Financial Forecast
    Financial Managers Society
    Financial Planning
    Finanical Reporting
    Fintect
    Fiscal Year 2015
    Fixed Income
    FL
    FMS
    Fmstv
    FRS
    GAMA
    Gary Wilberg
    Gerald H. Sherman
    Gift Tax
    Global Markets
    Greenberg Traurig
    Greene V. Commissioner
    Guggenheim Partners
    House Ways And Means
    IDProtect
    Incentive Based Compensation
    Incentive-based Compensation
    Income Tax
    Indexed BOLI
    Indexed Universal Life
    Inherit
    Inheritance
    In-Laws
    Insurance
    Insurance Premium
    Insurance Tax Liability
    Interest Rates
    Investment Portfolio
    Investments
    IRA
    IRC
    Irrevocable Trust
    IRS
    IUL
    IZALE
    IZALE Financial Group
    IZALE Testimonial
    JB Barnes
    Jim Patterson
    Jobs Act 2017
    Joe Tripalin
    Jonathan Barnes
    Jonathan M. Forster
    Ken Kies
    Key Person Life Policy
    Las Vegas
    Leadership
    Legacy Planning
    Life Insurance
    Life Policy
    Liquidity Risks
    LLP
    Long Term Disability
    Martin Kalb
    Matt Bush
    May Disability Month
    Media
    National Credit Union Administration
    NCUA
    Non-interest Income
    Non-profit
    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
    Nonqualified Plans
    NQDC
    Obama Administration
    Orlando
    Pay Ratio Rule
    Phil
    Phil Aderton
    Philip Aderton
    Ponzi Market
    Premarital Planning
    President Obama
    President's Budget
    Press
    Press Releases
    Profit Sharing
    PRS
    Rebecca Manicone
    Recession
    Regulationry Issues
    Regulatory Capital Calculation
    Regulatory Environments
    Resources
    Retirement
    Retirement Plan
    Revenue Strategies
    Richard A. Sirus
    Risk Management
    Roth
    R. Scott Richardson
    SBLI Term Life Insurance
    Scott MInard
    Scott Minerd
    Scott Richardson
    SEC
    Secure Checking
    SERP
    Sherman & Patterson
    Small Business Resale
    Social Security Tax
    Split Dollar Loans
    Split Dollar Plans
    Steve Brown
    Steve Fichtenbaum
    Steven B. Lapidus
    Stock Exchange
    Stock Market
    Stuart Lewis
    Tax Benefit
    Tax Code
    Tax Court
    Tax Cuts
    Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Of 2017
    Tax Deductions
    Tax Deferred Assets
    Tax Implications
    Tax Incentives
    Tax Law
    Tax Liabilities
    Tax Planning
    Tax Refor
    Tax Reform
    Taylor Advisors
    TCJA 2017
    The Forum
    Todd Taylor
    Top Hat Plans
    Treasury Bonds
    Trust
    Trustee
    Trusts
    US Supreme Court
    Washington Report
    Webinars
    Webinar W.O.W.S.
    Whole Life Insurance
    World Economic Forum
    World Economy
    WRMarketplace
    WRNewswire

Client Log-In

Log in to Pangburn
Log in to RBOLI.com

Contact

 855-492-5334 | Contact
Join Our Mailing List
© 2011 - 2019 IZALE Financial Group. All rights reserved. Login.
​Effective June 9, 2017, all individuals who provide advice to retirement plans, including Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), must abide by the fiduciary standard.  What does the fiduciary standard mean?  This means that your advisor must put your interests first before their own or that of the firm, make prudent recommendations, charge reasonable compensation and make no misrepresentations to you regarding recommended investments.  The recommendations made by your advisor must be based upon your specific investment needs and objectives.  The fiduciary standard is applicable to any recommendations that your advisor makes to you, the client, for your retirement account.
IZALE Website Privacy Policy
Please note the firm does have policies and procedures in place to monitor this level of fiduciary responsibility for our clients.
IZALE Financial Group does insurance business in California as IZALE LLC Insurance Agency
This site is published for residents of the United States only. Representatives may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed until appropriate registration is obtained or exemption from registration is determined. Not all of services referenced on this site are available in every state and through every advisor listed. For additional information, please contact Scott Richardson at 855-492-5334 .