• Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Executive Benefits
    • Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans – SERP
    • Split Dollar Loans
    • Deferral Plans
    • Welfare Plans
  • Revenue Strategies
    • Bank/Business Owned Life Insurance – BOLI
    • Corporate Owned Life Insurance – COLI
    • Insurance Company Owned Life Insurance
    • Managed Accounts
    • Guaranteed Income Contracts
    • Fee Income Strategies
  • Asset Protection
    • Estate Planning
    • Business Succession Planning
    • Key Person Planning
  • About
    • R. Scott Richardson, JD
    • Brenda R. Haag
    • Bruce F. Barge
    • Chris A. Richardson
    • Debra Hardimon
    • Fannie Mae Pantaleon
    • Jeff Prescher
    • Joe Tripalin
    • Patrick J. Costello
    • Philip Aderton >
      • 2019 CBAI IZALE Sponsored Golf Outing
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Events >
      • History – Calendars by Year >
        • 2019 Client Conference
        • 2017 Client Conference
        • 2015 Client Conference
    • Privacy Policy & Website Privacy Statement
    • Video Education
  • Contact
IZALE Financial Group

Blog

Gift, Estate, & Trust Tax Law Changes in New York, Maryland and Minnesota

6/4/2014

0 Comments

 
MARKET TREND:  States continue to make changes to their gift, estate and trust tax laws in an effort to increase revenue, in part by keeping wealthier residents from re-locating to low or no-estate tax jurisdictions and thus keeping more tax dollars in-state.

SYNOPSIS: 
Several states are contemplating modifications to their transfer tax laws, with New York, Maryland and Minnesota already passing changes.  Perhaps most significantly, New York has (1) increased its estate tax exemption but phased-out its application for larger estates, (2) enacted a 3-year look back rule that adds gifts made within three years of death back into the New York gross estate, (3) eliminated the state income tax benefits associated with so-called DING and NING trusts, and (4) repealed its generation skipping transfer tax.  The Maryland General Assembly has voted to gradually increase Maryland’s state estate tax exemption to eventually match the federal estate tax exemption by 2019. Minnesota has increased its estate tax exemption to $2 million, enacted a state QTIP election, and retroactively repealed its recently enacted state gift tax.

TAKE AWAY:  Given the extent and significance of New York’s tax law changes, New York residents should promptly review their existing legacy and wealth transfer plans with their advisors and determine whether and what changes need to be made, particularly with regard to the phase-out of the New York estate tax exemption and the change in taxation of DING/NING trusts (which essentially takes effect on June 1st). Minnesota residents also may want to review whether they should modify their estate plans given the availability of a new state QTIP election and whether they are due a refund for any state gift taxes paid.  Generally, as increases in state estate tax exemptions lessen the impact of state estate taxes for certain clients, the focus in planning will continue to shift from traditional estate tax plans to overall tax planning, including mitigation of the impact of federal and state income taxes.  PRIOR REPORTS:  14-12

Click here to download a printable pdf.
Following a trend in changes to state transfer tax laws, New York, Maryland and Minnesota have recently passed changes to their estate, gift, and in the case of New York, trust income tax laws, which could significantly impact legacy planning for residents of these states. Some of the more notable changes and their potential practical implications are summarized below. New York As discussed in WRMarketplace No.14-12, New York’s governor established the New York State Tax Reform and Fairness Commission in 2012 to review New York’s tax laws and develop revenue neutral options for modifications. Based on the Commission’s recommendations, the New York State Budget for 2014-2015, enacted effective as of April 1, 2014 (“NYS Budget”), makes several significant changes to New York’s income and estate tax laws, the following of which will be of interest for legacy and insurance planning advisors:

  • Estate Tax Exemption Increased and Phased-Out
Although the federal estate tax exemption for 2014 is $5,340,000, [1] New York has kept its estate tax exemption at $1,000,000 since February 2002 (“NYS exemption”). The NYS Budget, however, increases the NYS exemption over the next five years to eventually match the federal estate tax exemption as of January 1, 2019.  But for larger New York estates, the NYS Budget offsets the benefits of a higher NYS exemption by rapidly phasing out its application for estates in excess of the exemption amount.  The NYS exemption is fully phased-out for estates valued at more than 105% of the applicable exemption amount.

The NYS exemption and full phase-out thresholds are as follows:

Decedents Dying
On or After:


NYS

Exemption

Estate Threshold for Full Phase-Out 

April 1, 2014

$2,062,500

$2,165,625

April 1, 2015

$3,125,000

$3,281,250

April 1, 2016

$4,187,500

$4,396,875

April 1, 2017

$5,250,000

$5,512,500

January 1, 2019
and after

Indexed for inflation from 2010 (should match federal estate tax exemption)

105% of NYS exemption

The NYS exemption phase-out generates a tax “cliff,” which can produce significant New York estate tax exposure for estates that minimally exceed the applicable threshold for full phase-out.

Example:  An unmarried New York resident dies on April 1, 2017, when the NYS exemption is $5,250,000 and the full phase-out threshold is $5,512,500.  If the decedent has an estate valued at $5,512,500, just $262,500 over the NYS exemption, his estate will incur a New York estate tax of $452,300.  This imposes an effective marginal New York estate tax rate of 172% on the $262,500 in excess of the NYS exemption. Note that if the same decedent died under prior New York law (i.e., $1 million NYS exemption), his estimated New York estate tax would have been the same, $452,300.

Practical Implication:  Although the increase in the NYS exemption is expected to exclude 90% of New York estates from New York estate tax, it leaves New York estate tax exposure unchanged for wealthier estates.  Married New Yorkers can defer the impact of the cliff by designing the estate plan to take advantage of the NYS exemption at the first spouse’s death (there is no portability of the NYS exemption between spouses, so leaving everything to the surviving spouse and relying solely on the marital deduction may push the value of his or her estate over the phase-out threshold).  Depending on the estate’s size, unmarried New Yorkers may want to consider using a formula designed to make a deductible charitable gift of the excess over the exemption or phase-out amount or by allowing estate beneficiaries to disclaim the appropriate amount to charity.

  • Gifts Added Back to New York Gross Estate
New York, as with almost every other state (except Connecticut), does not impose a state gift tax.  Thus, prior to April 1, 2014, New York residents could reduce or avoid New York’s estate tax by making lifetime gifts, including just prior to death, resulting in a reduction in the size of their New York taxable estates and a corresponding loss of estate tax revenue. 

To counter this potential revenue loss, the NYS Budget requires the value of gifts made within three years of a donor’s date of death to be added back to the donor’s New York gross estate (if the donor was a New York resident at the time of the gifts).  The provision applies to gifts made on or after April 1, 2014 but before January 1, 2019.  Note that it seems that the value of gifts of non-New York real or tangible personal property by a New York resident could be pulled back into the New York resident’s estate under this provision, although New York law would not include the value of such items if owned by a New York decedent in determining the value of his or her New York gross estate.  Thus, further clarification likely is needed on this issue.

Practical Implications: Until 2019, this change reduces the gift tax planning options for reducing New York estate tax exposure and effectively eliminates the ability of New Yorkers to make deathbed transfers for New York estate tax planning purposes.  When combined with the phase out of the NYS exemption for estates in excess of the exemption, it could significantly increase the potential New York estate tax exposure for larger New York estates.

  • New York Tax Imposed on Exempt Resident Trusts, Including DING/NING Trusts
A New York resident trust (i.e., funded by an individual domiciled in New York when it became irrevocable or created under the will of a New York domiciliary) is exempt from New York income tax if (1) all trustees were domiciled outside New York, (2) all real and tangible trust property was located outside New York, and (3) all trust income and gain was derived from sources outside New York (“NY Exempt Trust”). 

Previously, incomplete gift trusts (“ING trusts”) -- generally trusts created as non-grantor trusts for federal income tax purposes in a low or no income tax state like Delaware or Nevada -- could avoid New York income tax if structured as NY Exempt Trusts. If the ING trust distributed no taxable income to the grantor or beneficiaries, neither the trust nor the New York grantor or beneficiaries would pay New York taxes on the trust’s income or gain from non-New York sources. 

The NYS Budget, however, now treats ING trusts created by New York residents as grantor trusts for New York income tax purposes, essentially “decoupling” New York’s income tax treatment of ING trusts from the federal income tax treatment.  Effective as of January 1, 2014, all items of an ING trust’s income, gain and loss will be includible in the trust grantor’s New York gross income, as if the assets of the trust were owned directly by the grantor; provided that this tax treatment will not apply to an ING trust liquidated before June 1, 2014.

In addition, for NY Exempt Trusts structured as completed gift trusts, New York will now subject New York beneficiaries to a “throwback tax” on trust distributions of income accumulated in prior years (subject to a credit for taxes paid in other jurisdictions).  The tax on the New York beneficiary applies to distributions made on or after June 1, 2014 of income accumulated on or after January 1, 2014.  The tax does not apply to distributions of trust income accumulated before a beneficiary is born, turns 21, or first becomes a New York resident.

Practical Implications:  New York residents no longer can avoid exposure to New York income tax by transferring assets to an ING trust, which eliminates a powerful state income tax planning tool, particularly for New York residents with significant income generating portfolios or anticipated liquidity events with regard to highly-appreciated assets. As ING trusts will no longer offer any New York income tax benefits, New York residents will want to consider liquidating ING trusts they have established prior to June 1, 2014 to avoid inclusion of the trust’s income in their New York gross income.

A New York resident, however, can continue to make completed gifts to a NY Exempt Trust created as a federal non-grantor trust.  While a New York beneficiary of the trust eventually may need to pay New York income taxes on distributions of accumulated income, the taxes are deferred until distribution and may be avoided if the beneficiary is not a New York resident at the time of distribution.  These trusts, however, will have additional record-keeping and reporting burdens for New York beneficiaries, as well as issues in determining the application and amount of the throwback tax.

  • Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Eliminated
The NYS Budget repeals the New York generation-skipping transfer tax as of April 1, 2014.

Maryland

  • Estate Tax Exemption Increased
The Maryland General Assembly has passed House Bill 739 / Senate Bill 602, which, beginning in 2015, gradually increases Maryland’s estate tax exemption from the current $1 million to eventually match the federal estate tax exemption, as follows:

Year
of Death


Maryland Estate Tax

Exemption

2015

$1,500,000

2016

$2,000,000

2017

$3,000,000

2018

$4,000,000

2019

Tied to federal estate tax exemption

Practical Implications:  With enactment, the re-coupling of Maryland’s estate tax exemption with the federal exemption should allow for more streamlined estate planning.  For example, the change should eventually eliminate the need to use a state “QTIP” trust to generate a state estate tax marital deduction for the amount by which the federal exemption exceeds the Maryland exemption.  Note, however, that Maryland still imposes a separate state “inheritance” tax on testamentary transfers to certain individuals.  Spouses, descendants (and their spouses), parents, grandparents, stepparents, stepchildren, and siblings are generally exempt from the Maryland inheritance tax, but a cousin or friend who receives a bequest, for example, could owe an inheritance tax of 10% on the value of the property received.

Minnesota

  • Estate Tax Rates Modified and Estate Tax Exemption Increased
Recent legislation enacted in Minnesota revises the state’s estate tax rates and increases its state estate tax exemption over the next four years to $2 million, as follows:
 

Year of
Death:


Minnesota Estate
Tax Exemption


Minnesota Estate Tax Rates 

2014

$1,200,000

9% - 16%

2015

$1,400,000

10% - 16%

2016

$1,600,000

10% - 16%

2017

$1,800,000

10% - 16%

2018

$2,000,000

10% - 16%

Practical Implications:  Since Minnesota does not re-couple its exemption with the federal estate tax exemption, additional planning still will be needed for married couples not to be subject to a Minnesota estate tax at the death of the first spouse on amounts in excess of the Minnesota exemption.  As discussed below, Minnesota will now allow a state QTIP election, which can provide a state estate tax marital deduction for the amount by with the federal exemption exceeds the Minnesota exemption.

  • State QTIP Election Allowed
Effective as of January 1, 2014, a Minnesota decedent’s executor can make a state QTIP election for assets passing in a QTIP trust to the surviving spouse, even if a corresponding federal QTIP election is not made (which will generate a state estate marital tax deduction at the death of the first spouse but avoid a federal estate tax on the state QTIP election amount on the death of the surviving spouse if previously shielded by the predeceased spouse’s federal estate tax exemption). 

  • State Gift Tax Retroactively Repealed
Less than one year after enacting a new state gift tax into law, Minnesota retroactively repealed the tax, which applied at a flat 10% rate on total lifetime gifts over $1 million made after June 30, 2013. Due to the retroactive repeal, Minnesota donors who made gifts after June 30, 2013 did not have to file a Minnesota gift tax return (due April 15, 2014), and any donor who filed and paid gift tax is entitled to a refund.

Minnesota, however, still retains a three-year look back rule, similar to New York’s, in that gifts made within three years of a Minnesota donor’s death will be added back to the donor’s estate for purposes of determining the donor’s estate tax liability.

Take Aways

  • Given the extent and significance of New York’s tax law changes, New York residents should
    promptly review their existing legacy and wealth transfer plans with their advisors and determine whether and what changes need to be made, particularly with regard to the phase-out of the New York estate tax exemption and the change in taxation of DING/NING trusts, the impact of which will become effective on June 1st. 

  • Minnesota residents also may want to review whether they should modify their estate plans given the availability of a new state QTIP election and whether they are due a refund for any state gift taxes paid.

  • Generally, as increases in state estate tax exemptions lessen the impact of state estate taxes for certain clients, the focus in planning will continue to shift from traditional estate tax plans to overall tax planning, including mitigation of the impact of federal and state income taxes.

NOTES
_____________

1 Based on a $5,000,000 exemption amount that will be adjusted for inflation from January 1, 2012.

DISCLAIMER

In order to comply with requirements imposed by the IRS which may apply to the Washington Report as distributed or as re-circulated by our members, please be advised of the following:

THE ABOVE ADVICE WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND IT CANNOT BE USED, BY YOU FOR THE PURPOSES OF AVOIDING ANY PENALTY THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE.

In the event that this Washington Report is also considered to be a “marketed opinion” within the meaning of the IRS guidance, then, as required by the IRS, please be further advised of the following:

THE ABOVE ADVICE WAS NOT WRITTEN TO SUPPORT THE PROMOTIONS OR MARKETING OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS ADDRESSED BY THE WRITTEN ADVICE, AND, BASED ON THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES, YOU SHOULD SEEK ADVICE FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    IZALE Financial Group

    As an independent firm, we’re driven by close client relationships. For you, that means that our technical expertise is yours to rely on. 

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    March 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013


    Categories

    All
    1035 Tax Deferred Exchange
    2018
    401K
    457f Plans
    AALU
    A. M. Ratings
    Articles
    Asset Man
    Asset Management
    Asset Protection
    BalancedComp
    Bank
    Banking
    Bank Owned Life Insurance
    Bankruptcy
    Banks
    Basel III
    Bear Market
    Beneficiary
    Benefit Plans
    Benefits
    Board Of Directors
    BOL
    BOLI
    Brian Smedley
    Bruce Barge
    Buisness Owned Life Insurance
    Business Owned Life Insurance
    Butterfly Effect
    Capital Conservation Buffer
    Capital Management
    Capital Requirements
    Cap Rates
    CBAI
    CDC
    CDI
    Center For Disease Control
    CEO
    CFO
    Chris
    Chris Richardson
    Clawback
    COI
    Cole Frago
    COLI
    Common Equity
    Commuity Bank Of Trenton
    Community Banking
    Community Banks
    Compensation
    Compliance
    Connecticut Court
    Consumer Protection Act
    Consumer Protection Act Of 2010
    Coronavirus
    Corporate Owned Life Insurance
    Corporate Taxation
    CPA
    Credit Rates
    Credit Union
    Credit Union Magazine
    Credit Union National Association
    Credit Unions
    CUES
    CUNA
    Daniel Kahneman
    DBO
    DCUC
    DCUC Alert Magazine
    Death Benefits
    Defense Credit Union Council
    Divorce
    Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform
    Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
    Econocheck
    Economic Forecast
    Employee Benefits
    ERISA
    Estate Planning
    Estate Tax
    Estate Trust
    Executive Benefits
    Executive Compensation
    Executive Retirement Plans
    Family Legacy
    FDIC
    Federal Reserve Bank
    Fee-based Checking
    Fee Checking
    Fee Income Strategies
    FICA
    Finance Industry
    Financial Education
    Financial Executives
    Financial Forecast
    Financial Managers Society
    Financial Planning
    Finanical Reporting
    Fintect
    Fiscal Year 2015
    Fixed Income
    FL
    FMS
    Fmstv
    FRS
    GAMA
    Gary Wilberg
    Gerald H. Sherman
    Gift Tax
    Global Markets
    Greenberg Traurig
    Greene V. Commissioner
    Guggenheim Partners
    House Ways And Means
    IDProtect
    Incentive Based Compensation
    Incentive-based Compensation
    Income Tax
    Indexed BOLI
    Indexed Universal Life
    Inherit
    Inheritance
    In-Laws
    Insurance
    Insurance Premium
    Insurance Tax Liability
    Interest Rates
    Investment Portfolio
    Investments
    IRA
    IRC
    Irrevocable Trust
    IRS
    IUL
    IZALE
    IZALE Financial Group
    IZALE Testimonial
    JB Barnes
    Jim Patterson
    Jobs Act 2017
    Joe Tripalin
    Jonathan Barnes
    Jonathan M. Forster
    Ken Kies
    Key Person Life Policy
    Las Vegas
    Leadership
    Legacy Planning
    Life Insurance
    Life Policy
    Liquidity Risks
    LLP
    Long Term Disability
    Martin Kalb
    Matt Bush
    May Disability Month
    Media
    National Credit Union Administration
    NCUA
    Non-interest Income
    Non-profit
    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
    Nonqualified Plans
    NQDC
    Obama Administration
    Orlando
    Pay Ratio Rule
    Phil
    Phil Aderton
    Philip Aderton
    Ponzi Market
    Premarital Planning
    President Obama
    President's Budget
    Press
    Press Releases
    Profit Sharing
    PRS
    Rebecca Manicone
    Recession
    Regulationry Issues
    Regulatory Capital Calculation
    Regulatory Environments
    Resources
    Retirement
    Retirement Plan
    Revenue Strategies
    Richard A. Sirus
    Risk Management
    Roth
    R. Scott Richardson
    SBLI Term Life Insurance
    Scott MInard
    Scott Minerd
    Scott Richardson
    SEC
    Secure Checking
    SERP
    Sherman & Patterson
    Small Business Resale
    Social Security Tax
    Split Dollar Loans
    Split Dollar Plans
    Steve Brown
    Steve Fichtenbaum
    Steven B. Lapidus
    Stock Exchange
    Stock Market
    Stuart Lewis
    Tax Benefit
    Tax Code
    Tax Court
    Tax Cuts
    Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Of 2017
    Tax Deductions
    Tax Deferred Assets
    Tax Implications
    Tax Incentives
    Tax Law
    Tax Liabilities
    Tax Planning
    Tax Refor
    Tax Reform
    Taylor Advisors
    TCJA 2017
    The Forum
    Todd Taylor
    Top Hat Plans
    Treasury Bonds
    Trust
    Trustee
    Trusts
    US Supreme Court
    Washington Report
    Webinars
    Webinar W.O.W.S.
    Whole Life Insurance
    World Economic Forum
    World Economy
    WRMarketplace
    WRNewswire

Client Log-In

Log in to Pangburn
Log in to RBOLI.com

Contact

 855-492-5334 | Contact
Join Our Mailing List
© 2011 - 2019 IZALE Financial Group. All rights reserved. Login.
​Effective June 9, 2017, all individuals who provide advice to retirement plans, including Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), must abide by the fiduciary standard.  What does the fiduciary standard mean?  This means that your advisor must put your interests first before their own or that of the firm, make prudent recommendations, charge reasonable compensation and make no misrepresentations to you regarding recommended investments.  The recommendations made by your advisor must be based upon your specific investment needs and objectives.  The fiduciary standard is applicable to any recommendations that your advisor makes to you, the client, for your retirement account.
IZALE Website Privacy Policy
Please note the firm does have policies and procedures in place to monitor this level of fiduciary responsibility for our clients.
IZALE Financial Group does insurance business in California as IZALE LLC Insurance Agency
This site is published for residents of the United States only. Representatives may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed until appropriate registration is obtained or exemption from registration is determined. Not all of services referenced on this site are available in every state and through every advisor listed. For additional information, please contact Scott Richardson at 855-492-5334 .